<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Fluent.Interface</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brightsparc.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brightsparc.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Julian's musings on .NET and other technobabble</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 16:12:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on High performance Pub/Sub .NET libraries by Nick</title>
		<link>http://brightsparc.wordpress.com/2008/06/17/ccr-high-performance-pubsub-net-libraries/#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 16:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brightsparc.wordpress.com/?p=40#comment-82</guid>
		<description>Is it possible to Rank these API&#039;s. I am looking at this from a long term perspective. IE will the CCR become part of WCF or will it replace WCF?

What are some negatives of rolling your own WCF pub sub verses using NServiceBus. Also if you are integrating with Silverlight is it a No brainier to stay with WCF?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it possible to Rank these API&#8217;s. I am looking at this from a long term perspective. IE will the CCR become part of WCF or will it replace WCF?</p>
<p>What are some negatives of rolling your own WCF pub sub verses using NServiceBus. Also if you are integrating with Silverlight is it a No brainier to stay with WCF?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Open source .NET CMS, Oxite by Christian Burne</title>
		<link>http://brightsparc.wordpress.com/2008/12/18/open-source-net-cms-oxite/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian Burne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 22:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brightsparc.wordpress.com/?p=111#comment-80</guid>
		<description>Hey Julian;

We found Umbraco to be a very good .NET based CMS for Open Source.  Also on the Java side, we found Jahia to be better than Alfresco, Magnolia or Open CMS.

We put together the .NET Open Source CMS&#039;s here: http://www.oshyn.com/_blog/Web_Content_Management/post/Dot_Net_Content_Management_Systems

And the results of some preliminary Jahia analysis here: http://www.oshyn.com/_blog/Web_Content_Management/post/Jahia_Open_Source_CMS_(for_Java_developers)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Julian;</p>
<p>We found Umbraco to be a very good .NET based CMS for Open Source.  Also on the Java side, we found Jahia to be better than Alfresco, Magnolia or Open CMS.</p>
<p>We put together the .NET Open Source CMS&#8217;s here: <a href="http://www.oshyn.com/_blog/Web_Content_Management/post/Dot_Net_Content_Management_Systems" rel="nofollow">http://www.oshyn.com/_blog/Web_Content_Management/post/Dot_Net_Content_Management_Systems</a></p>
<p>And the results of some preliminary Jahia analysis here: <a href="http://www.oshyn.com/_blog/Web_Content_Management/post/Jahia_Open_Source_CMS_(for_Java_developers)" rel="nofollow">http://www.oshyn.com/_blog/Web_Content_Management/post/Jahia_Open_Source_CMS_(for_Java_developers)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Multi-Threading, Silverlight Sockets &amp; Visualisation Part 2 by m.saad</title>
		<link>http://brightsparc.wordpress.com/2008/05/27/multi-threading-silverlight-sockets-visualisation-part-2/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>m.saad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 19:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brightsparc.wordpress.com/?p=33#comment-75</guid>
		<description>hi! 
the byte[] image is it a raw data(no compressed data)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi!<br />
the byte[] image is it a raw data(no compressed data)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on TDD on show with ASP.NET MVC at Mix09 by Jo</title>
		<link>http://brightsparc.wordpress.com/2009/04/03/tdd-on-show-with-aspnet-mvc-at-mix09/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>Jo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 08:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brightsparc.wordpress.com/?p=193#comment-63</guid>
		<description>A good resource for Unit Testing ASP.NET 

http://www.typemock.com/ASP.NET_unit_testing_page.php

 (with the ‘AAA’ approach: Arrange, Act, and Assert)


A tutorial on Test Driven Development http://www.typemock.com/Test_Driven_Development_TDD.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A good resource for Unit Testing ASP.NET </p>
<p><a href="http://www.typemock.com/ASP.NET_unit_testing_page.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.typemock.com/ASP.NET_unit_testing_page.php</a></p>
<p> (with the ‘AAA’ approach: Arrange, Act, and Assert)</p>
<p>A tutorial on Test Driven Development <a href="http://www.typemock.com/Test_Driven_Development_TDD.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.typemock.com/Test_Driven_Development_TDD.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The future is parallel by brightsparc</title>
		<link>http://brightsparc.wordpress.com/2008/12/16/the-future-is-parallel/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>brightsparc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 10:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brightsparc.wordpress.com/?p=127#comment-55</guid>
		<description>Yes reading &lt;a href=&quot;http://embedded.com/columns/breakpoint/212300032&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this article&lt;/a&gt; by embedded.com&#039;s Jack Ganssle highlights some of the challenges.  It seems under the hood the implementation might be a combination of multiple nodes connecting a few &#039;in-order&#039; cores that play well together such as in the last Microsoft HPC Server 2008 &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.microsoft.com/casestudies/casestudy.aspx?casestudyid=4000003006&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Dawning super computer&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes reading <a href="http://embedded.com/columns/breakpoint/212300032" rel="nofollow">this article</a> by embedded.com&#8217;s Jack Ganssle highlights some of the challenges.  It seems under the hood the implementation might be a combination of multiple nodes connecting a few &#8216;in-order&#8217; cores that play well together such as in the last Microsoft HPC Server 2008 <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/casestudies/casestudy.aspx?casestudyid=4000003006" rel="nofollow">Dawning super computer</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The future is parallel by David Keaveny</title>
		<link>http://brightsparc.wordpress.com/2008/12/16/the-future-is-parallel/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>David Keaveny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 02:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brightsparc.wordpress.com/?p=127#comment-54</guid>
		<description>From what I was reading last week (sorry, can&#039;t remember the link offhand), once you hit 16 cores, it&#039;s the performance of the memory systems that make the difference, and the technology currently there just cannot keep up.

It&#039;ll be interesting to see what Microsoft give us to handle the software side of things in the meantime.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what I was reading last week (sorry, can&#8217;t remember the link offhand), once you hit 16 cores, it&#8217;s the performance of the memory systems that make the difference, and the technology currently there just cannot keep up.</p>
<p>It&#8217;ll be interesting to see what Microsoft give us to handle the software side of things in the meantime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google and Microsoft to throw their weight behind OpenID by David Keaveny</title>
		<link>http://brightsparc.wordpress.com/2008/10/30/google-and-microsoft-to-throw-their-weight-behind-openid/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>David Keaveny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 21:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brightsparc.wordpress.com/?p=104#comment-50</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve had problems before, using Google&#039;s OpenID to log in to sites. A strange day indeed when Microsoft implement a standard properly and &quot;Do No Evil&quot; Google fork it and roll their own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had problems before, using Google&#8217;s OpenID to log in to sites. A strange day indeed when Microsoft implement a standard properly and &#8220;Do No Evil&#8221; Google fork it and roll their own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google and Microsoft to throw their weight behind OpenID by Nic Wise</title>
		<link>http://brightsparc.wordpress.com/2008/10/30/google-and-microsoft-to-throw-their-weight-behind-openid/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>Nic Wise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 12:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brightsparc.wordpress.com/?p=104#comment-49</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a good start - the MS one anyway - but the google one is very much a walled garden - you have to recode your site to use the google forked version of openID, not the actual &quot;open&quot; openID standard.

Pity. They were so close.... MS, however, IS using proper OpenID - I&#039;m sure Google will, given the general outcry eg &quot;WTF are you doing people!&quot;

But yeah - I&#039;d much prefer to use http://openid.google.com/nicw@.... etc - for the moment, for me, it&#039;s wordpress.com :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a good start &#8211; the MS one anyway &#8211; but the google one is very much a walled garden &#8211; you have to recode your site to use the google forked version of openID, not the actual &#8220;open&#8221; openID standard.</p>
<p>Pity. They were so close&#8230;. MS, however, IS using proper OpenID &#8211; I&#8217;m sure Google will, given the general outcry eg &#8220;WTF are you doing people!&#8221;</p>
<p>But yeah &#8211; I&#8217;d much prefer to use <a href="http://openid.google.com/nicw@..." rel="nofollow">http://openid.google.com/nicw@&#8230;</a>. etc &#8211; for the moment, for me, it&#8217;s wordpress.com <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Multi-Threading, Silverlight Sockets &amp; Visualisation Part 1 by mumble mumble &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Flex 3 vs. SilverLight 2.0</title>
		<link>http://brightsparc.wordpress.com/2008/05/20/multi-threading-silverlight-sockets-visualisation-part-1/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>mumble mumble &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Flex 3 vs. SilverLight 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 06:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brightsparc.wordpress.com/?p=29#comment-48</guid>
		<description>[...] of highspeed processors. For more information on Silverlight and multithreading take a look a this article which finds that &#8220;Microsoft’s new parallel library wins out on a 2:1 ratio over the single [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of highspeed processors. For more information on Silverlight and multithreading take a look a this article which finds that &#8220;Microsoft’s new parallel library wins out on a 2:1 ratio over the single [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google street view in Sydney by Matt O'Kane</title>
		<link>http://brightsparc.wordpress.com/2008/08/06/google-street-view-in-sydney/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt O'Kane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 19:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brightsparc.wordpress.com/?p=55#comment-46</guid>
		<description>It is amazing that a great majority of Sydney photos have clouds.

I checked here (http://members.ozemail.com.au/~macinnis@ozemail.com.au/syd/weather.htm) and even though most Sydney-siders perceive that the sun shines all the time, it only really shines uninterrupted for about a quarter of the year, and for about a third of the year it comes in and out of the day.

But, you&#039;d think Google would try and get sunny days. All photos look better under sun...! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is amazing that a great majority of Sydney photos have clouds.</p>
<p>I checked here (<a href="http://members.ozemail.com.au/~macinnis@ozemail.com.au/syd/weather.htm" rel="nofollow">http://members.ozemail.com.au/~macinnis@ozemail.com.au/syd/weather.htm</a>) and even though most Sydney-siders perceive that the sun shines all the time, it only really shines uninterrupted for about a quarter of the year, and for about a third of the year it comes in and out of the day.</p>
<p>But, you&#8217;d think Google would try and get sunny days. All photos look better under sun&#8230;! <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
